World newsSenate Bill on IVF Protections and Coverage Fails to...

Senate Bill on IVF Protections and Coverage Fails to Advance Amidst Political Debate

-




Senate Bill on IVF Protections and Coverage

Failure of the Senate Bill on IVF Protections and Coverage

The recent Senate bill, known as the Right to IVF Act, which aimed to provide federal protections and expand insurance coverage for fertility treatments like IVF, has failed to advance. The bill fell short of the required 60 votes to overcome a filibuster, concluding with a final tally of 51-44.

Political Dynamics and Sponsorship

The bill was spearheaded by Democratic Senator Tammy Duckworth of Illinois. Despite some Republican expressions of ideological support for IVF, a significant majority opposed the bill. They criticized it as being unnecessary and politically driven. Among the Republicans, only Senators Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine voted in favor of the bill.

Former President Donald Trump had publicly endorsed IVF and hinted at policies that would ensure government or insurance companies covered IVF costs. However, this endorsement did not suffice to garner enough Republican Senate support for the bill.

Context and Future Legislative Efforts

This marks the second attempt in three months by Senate Democrats to pass such legislation. Both attempts have been thwarted by Republican opposition. The political milieu surrounding the vote was seen as a strategic move by Democrats to bring attention to Republican opposition on reproductive health issues, setting the stage for the 2024 elections.

Conversely, Republican senators proposed alternative legislation, such as a bill by Senators Katie Britt and Ted Cruz, that sought to prevent states receiving federal Medicaid funding from banning IVF. Democrats, however, contended that these alternative proposals had significant loopholes that did not address the core issues.

Repercussions and Future Prospects

The failure of this bill highlights the ongoing contentious debates surrounding reproductive rights, particularly in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which ended federal abortion rights. This development adds another layer to the discussion on reproductive health protections and federal policies.

Senator Duckworth has indicated that Democrats may consider reintroducing the legislation post the 2024 elections. There are also discussions about potentially lifting the filibuster to facilitate the passage of such critical legislation without the burden of the 60-vote threshold.

Invest in Precious Metals

Looking for a secure investment? Consider Dolly Varden Silver (TSX.V:DV | OTCQX:DOLLF) for your precious metals portfolio. Learn more at Dolly Varden Silver.

References

  • Dolly Varden Silver

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Latest news

Four-Year-Old Boy Who Smashed Rare Bronze Age Jar Returns To Museum In Israel

A four-year-old boy who accidentally broke an ancient urn dating back to the late Bronze Age has returned for...

Donald Trump Threatens To Imprison Mark Zuckerburg For

Donald Trump has threatened to imprison Mark Zuckerberg if the Facebook founder does "anything illegal" to influence the upcoming...

Hamas Commander Killed In West Bank, Israeli Military Says

Israeli border police say they have killed a senior Hamas commander in the West Bank. The military says Wassem...

Abba Demands Donald Trump Campaign Stop Use Of Their Music – Joining Long List Of Stars

Abba has become the third musical act this month to complain about its music being used in Donald Trump's...

Saudi Arabia calls for more pressure on Iran as Houthi threat grows

The claimed acquisition by Yemen’s Houthi rebels of hypersonic...

Hezbollah pager explosions, if caused by the Mossad, would be a big escalation

It may not have been acknowledged by Israel but...

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x